Share the latest news and broadcast your views, use this board for topics that relate to more than one county
User avatar
By gmdf
#22539
mav wrote:
Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:55 am
I think that the umpire not having the final say is a bigger blow to the sport than all this T20 stuff.
Surely the fact that more decisions are now correct (especially run outs, stumpings and 'feathered' catches) makes the game better (& fairer)? With modern technology umpires making an honest (but wrong) decision are shown up & embarrassed, which helps no-one.
Last edited by gmdf on Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
By mav
#22540
gmdf wrote:
Thu Nov 16, 2017 12:40 pm
mav wrote:
Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:55 am
I think that the umpire not having the final say is a bigger blow to the sport than all this T20 stuff.
Surely the fact that more decisions are now correct (especially run outs, stumpings and 'feathered' catches) makes the game better (& fairer)? With modern technology umpires making an honest (but wrong) decision is shown up & embarrassed, which helps no-one.
Not for me, wrong decisions are part of sport, umpires get much less wrong than players and I miss the fact a umpire was respected before.
User avatar
By gmdf
#23151
Just read this Tweet:
The Full Toss Cricket Blog‏
@thefulltoss
Follow Follow @thefulltoss
More
So the Big Bash has lost $33m in its first 5 years, despite the big crowds and the fact that cricket fans have a natural affinity with their teams. What on earth is the ECB’s new city comp going to lose when many fans ignore it and keep watching their counties?
Wonder how the ECB feel - seems to me they are gambling with the future of English cricket.
By LankyShark
#23414
Looks like an excuse for a further reduction in the Championship. Why don’t they make the CC into a knockout tournament instead?

They could play it between the top 4 teams in the T20 once the proper season is over. Say in October? It could be restricted to under 12s?

Perhaps I shouldn’t give them ideas. But that’s certainly the way it is going.
PaulTavs, Iron Mike liked this
By Iron Mike
#23583
gmdf wrote:
Tue Apr 17, 2018 11:44 am
An interesting article on what the new Franchise T20 may mean for the counties here:


http://www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/ ... -proposals
That was a source of hot debate at our match in Bristol. If tests go to 4 days there could be scope to revert to 3 day cc with one division.

I'd rather one division of 4 days with alternate fixtures but it's not going to happen. As long as the cc is an open draw and not regionalised and county membership reflects the reduction in proper cricket...we'll see. Or could Scotland Holland Ireland Denmark or even minor counties combination be included?

As for ko comp...brings prospect of visiting different away grounds. As it used to be.

If cc is reduced to 5 home matches it could spell the end of more outgrounds for cc. On the other side though is scope to use them when the county hq is used for the t16.4

The visiting tourists should play more counties and upgrade them to challenge matches..as they used to be. Also perhaps play the fc Irish provinces, the associates etc. Keep fc alive somehow in the t16.4 as no doubt most county fans will want to see their team in the best weather and especially over weekends.
User avatar
By gmdf
#23773
The ECB haven't finished with tinkering with the game they are supposed to defend:

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/spor ... -sftfnjm88
The ECB’s new 100-ball, family-friendly format could be split into two spells of 50 successive balls from each end of the ground.

It had previously been thought that the eight-team tournament, which will start in 2020 and has been provisionally called “The Hundred”, would feature two innings made up of 15 traditional six-ball overs and one ten-ball over.

But The Times understands that the ECB is so determined to ensure matches do not last longer than two-and-a-half hours that it is still considering alternative ways in which the 100 balls could be divided.

The ECB is mindful that there has been criticism of the 16-over idea and wants to avoid complicating the new game. It has even discussed abandoning leg-before as a method of dismissal, although it is understood this was considered too radical a change and was not seriously considered.

Sky and BBC, who will broadcast the new event, are keen for the game to be shorter, but it is understood that they do not want it to stray too far from the fundamental laws of cricket.

Also of interest:

The eight teams will be managed by a committee and a general manager. The committee will contain officials from two or three counties with the partnerships at each venue as follows: The Oval — Surrey and Kent; Lord’s — Middlesex, Northamptonshire and Essex; Southampton — Hampshire and Sussex; Cardiff — Glamorgan, Gloucestershire and Somerset; Headingley — Yorkshire and Durham; Trent Bridge — Nottinghamshire, Derbyshire and Leicestershire; Edgbaston — Warwickshire and Worcestershire; Old Trafford — Lancashire only.
  • 1
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8

I've seen this one on quite a few other forums and[…]

2nd XI

Personally I think it is very disappointing that t[…]

Match 3 brings Middlesex to the Gardens whom we us[…]

Royal London One Day Cup

Was hoping for a change of fortunes as a new compe[…]